<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for anti-babel - sanjay sharma</title>
	<atom:link href="http://antibabel.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://antibabel.wordpress.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 09:42:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on WordPress as Academic Journal Software? by sanjay</title>
		<link>http://antibabel.wordpress.com/2009/12/06/wordpress-as-academic-journal-software/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>sanjay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 09:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antibabel.wordpress.com/?p=113#comment-135</guid>
		<description>PLoS ONE certainly is impressive. Though from my understanding, it uses a TOPAZ framework http://www.plos.org/about/faq.html#topaz

I haven&#039;t looked into it much, but it appears far more complex to deploy than Wordpress or Drupal. From the perspective of limited/non-funded journals, a PHP based platform is appealing as server hosting is relatively cheap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PLoS ONE certainly is impressive. Though from my understanding, it uses a TOPAZ framework <a href="http://www.plos.org/about/faq.html#topaz" rel="nofollow">http://www.plos.org/about/faq.html#topaz</a></p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t looked into it much, but it appears far more complex to deploy than WordPress or Drupal. From the perspective of limited/non-funded journals, a PHP based platform is appealing as server hosting is relatively cheap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on WordPress as Academic Journal Software? by Daniel Mietchen</title>
		<link>http://antibabel.wordpress.com/2009/12/06/wordpress-as-academic-journal-software/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Mietchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antibabel.wordpress.com/?p=113#comment-134</guid>
		<description>I am not convinced that WP is necessarily the best option here - PLoS ONE (http://plosone.org/ ), for instance, runs on Drupal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not convinced that WP is necessarily the best option here &#8211; PLoS ONE (<a href="http://plosone.org/" rel="nofollow">http://plosone.org/</a> ), for instance, runs on Drupal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dis-Orienting Rhythms: the politics of the new Asian dance music by Raven</title>
		<link>http://antibabel.wordpress.com/2009/03/11/dis-orienting-rhythms-the-politics-of-the-new-asian-dance-music/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Raven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antibabel.wordpress.com/?p=69#comment-129</guid>
		<description>Thanks Sanjay for making this available. I&#039;ve enjoyed dipping into it again, many years later. It was a seminal work by all of you. I&#039;ve posted about this on my blog and, as I said on John H&#039;s blog, let me know if anything is amiss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Sanjay for making this available. I&#8217;ve enjoyed dipping into it again, many years later. It was a seminal work by all of you. I&#8217;ve posted about this on my blog and, as I said on John H&#8217;s blog, let me know if anything is amiss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mobilizing India: Women, Music, and Migration between India and Trinidad by Nisha Ji</title>
		<link>http://antibabel.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/mobilizing-india-women-music-and-migration-between-india-and-trinidad/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Nisha Ji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 10:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antibabel.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/mobilizing-india-women-music-and-migration-between-india-and-trinidad/#comment-121</guid>
		<description>It is great review. But it is not whole India whole things. Music is from a part of India as well as women and migration. If we look into migration then In India most of the people migrate from Bihar and Uttar Pradesh. If we look women then they migrate from West Bengal of India mostly. Like this music basically from Maharashtra and UP. It is migration situation of music and women from India.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is great review. But it is not whole India whole things. Music is from a part of India as well as women and migration. If we look into migration then In India most of the people migrate from Bihar and Uttar Pradesh. If we look women then they migrate from West Bengal of India mostly. Like this music basically from Maharashtra and UP. It is migration situation of music and women from India.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Facebook Evil? privacy leaks, data flows and conspiracy theories by stef</title>
		<link>http://antibabel.wordpress.com/2007/10/09/is-facebook-evil-privacy-leaks-data-flows-and-conspiracy-theories/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>stef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 20:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antibabel.wordpress.com/2007/10/09/is-facebook-evil-privacy-leaks-data-flows-and-conspiracy-theories/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>v. interesting. ta. must look at settings and addiction! not a good sign for data protection measures my end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>v. interesting. ta. must look at settings and addiction! not a good sign for data protection measures my end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Facebook Evil? privacy leaks, data flows and conspiracy theories by elizabethwong</title>
		<link>http://antibabel.wordpress.com/2007/10/09/is-facebook-evil-privacy-leaks-data-flows-and-conspiracy-theories/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>elizabethwong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 09:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antibabel.wordpress.com/2007/10/09/is-facebook-evil-privacy-leaks-data-flows-and-conspiracy-theories/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Excellent!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on British Bhangra: A Symposium by British Bhangra: A Symposium &#8212; Movie Information blog</title>
		<link>http://antibabel.wordpress.com/2007/09/10/british-bhangra-a-symposium/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>British Bhangra: A Symposium &#8212; Movie Information blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 16:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antibabel.wordpress.com/2007/09/10/british-bhangra-a-symposium/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>[...] and its industry. &#8230; Panel 1 British Bhangra: An Historical Overview 11&#8230;.    source: British Bhangra: A Symposium, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and its industry. &#8230; Panel 1 British Bhangra: An Historical Overview 11&#8230;.    source: British Bhangra: A Symposium, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The conceit of Academic Peer Review by sanjay</title>
		<link>http://antibabel.wordpress.com/2007/09/11/the-conceipt-of-academic-peer-review/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>sanjay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 18:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antibabel.wordpress.com/2007/09/11/the-conceipt-of-academic-peer-review/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Yes, it&#039;s an appalling review. 
And what&#039;s worse is how the Journal Editors simply passed it on to me. Scandalous! 
My article was rejected on the basis of this single review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it&#8217;s an appalling review.<br />
And what&#8217;s worse is how the Journal Editors simply passed it on to me. Scandalous!<br />
My article was rejected on the basis of this single review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Retro-Writing: back to basics by A &#8220;fit&#8221; between technology and usage &#171; walking without rhythm</title>
		<link>http://antibabel.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/retro-writing-back-to-basics/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>A &#8220;fit&#8221; between technology and usage &#171; walking without rhythm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 06:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antibabel.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/retro-writing-back-to-basics/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>[...] (Steven Poole found via anti-babel) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Steven Poole found via anti-babel) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The conceit of Academic Peer Review by Anna Gough-Yates</title>
		<link>http://antibabel.wordpress.com/2007/09/11/the-conceipt-of-academic-peer-review/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Gough-Yates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 10:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antibabel.wordpress.com/2007/09/11/the-conceipt-of-academic-peer-review/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>I am amazed at this Sanjay. Not only is it a vile review, but the fact that this is a rejection that seems to be based entirely on the fact that the author misunderstands and disagrees with your paper is outrageous! Surely journal articles are to provoke debate, not just to replicate the views of reviewers and editors? What a boring place the world would be  (and reading this review, apparently is). I&#039;d be tempted to write to the editors and complain, but of course, there are risks here too.....chin up and send it to a journal that will appreciate it.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am amazed at this Sanjay. Not only is it a vile review, but the fact that this is a rejection that seems to be based entirely on the fact that the author misunderstands and disagrees with your paper is outrageous! Surely journal articles are to provoke debate, not just to replicate the views of reviewers and editors? What a boring place the world would be  (and reading this review, apparently is). I&#8217;d be tempted to write to the editors and complain, but of course, there are risks here too&#8230;..chin up and send it to a journal that will appreciate it&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
